Write Good Books

Jason Bougger's blog for new and aspiring writers

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • About
  • Writing Resources
  • Podcast
    • Episode List
    • Podcast Contact Form
  • Articles
    • All Writing Posts
    • Site News
    • Author Spotlights
    • 5 Links Friday
    • Personal
  • Contact Forms
    • General Feedback Form
    • Podcast Contact Form
    • Author Spotlight Submission Form

Surprise your audience, but be sure it makes sense in the long-term

April 5, 2018 By: Jason Bougger

Here's a look at the a creative mistake by the WWE writing team at Wrestlemania 30.

I’ve never been shy to admit that I’m a fan of professional wrestling. Well, maybe I should say I used to be a fan of professional wrestling. Due to the combination of life’s responsibilities, the kids, and just the fact that the current product is nearly unwatchable to us fans of the 80s and 90s, I just don’t follow it at all anymore.

It’s a shame because it played such a huge part of my life for so many years. Anyhow, this weekend is Wrestlemania…I don’t know…30-something, and I don’t even know who is in the main event. Or any of the other matches.

But enough about that. Since it is Wrestlemania weekend, I thought I’d share some excerpts from a post I wrote for an older blog the day after Wrestlemania 30.

It’s about the writing, and how the writers made one of the worst decisions in Wrestlemania history.

…I’ve got to talk about a creative decision they made last night that I totally disagree with.

I’ll try to sum up the background quickly, but basically there is a character named The Undertaker, who in the last 29 years of Wrestlemania has won every one of his 21 matches at the event. A huge selling point of the annual event is to see how Undertaker can defeat his next opponent. His Wrestlemania matches in the last five years have been written to tell a story of high drama and suspense with lots of “almosts” and big moves to bring the audience to their feet, with Undertaker beating the odds and winning in the end.

Last night he faced a true beast and legit touch guy (and former UFC champ) Brock Lesnar. You’d expect the same formula, but maybe a bit more brutality. Maybe even blood if we’re lucky. But what you couldn’t expect is for Lesnar to win the match. He’s not a full-time wrestler; his contract has very limited dates on it and in the last year, he’s lost to two other stars who Undertaker had defeated multiple times in previous Wrestlemanias.

In other words, if you’re a writer for WWE, you’re not going to “waste” The Undertaker’s first Wrestlemania loss on a guy like Lesnar. You’re either going to let him retire undefeated at Mania, or have him lose a close, dramatic match to a new guy you hope to build the company around for the next decade.

But instead, the WWE writers did decide to waste the loss. In a relatively boring match, Lesnar basically threw Undertaker around like he was nothing, shrugged off the big offense, and beat him cleanly (that means without any foul play, which is rare for a “bad guy”) in the middle of the ring.

This is the worst major creative decision WWE has made in a long time. For well over a decade, the titles have become nothing but props and the matches have become nothing more than plot elements to supplement the storylines. The only thing in WWE that remained “real” was The Undertaker’s undefeated streak at Wrestlemania.

And now they killed it. For what? To make a guy who isn’t even on the full-time roster look strong for a few months until he loses to their champ and then goes on another hiatus until the money is right for another short-term return. Sure it shocked the audience in attendance. It shocked the people watching at home. It shock the idiots like me who accidentally read the result before I watched the match.

But other than shocking the audience, what purpose did it serve?

If you’re writing fiction, and that includes professional wrestling, you’ve got to make sure that when you write a scene for shock value that it doesn’t have any negative effects in the long-term.

And this poorly thought-out decision has nothing but negative effects in the long-term. At least in my opinion.

So that was what I had to say. I still hold to that opinion. Shock value for the sack of shock value does nothing for your story. It may get people “talking” for a little while, but if it’s done with no real reason, and doesn’t add to your overall plot, it’s nothing more than Katie Vick. (For the non-wrestling fans, make sure you drink a few beers before you look that one up.)

And for you wrestling fans out there, have a great Wrestlemania weekend. For the rest of you, thanks for reading, and if you’re in the Nebraska area, it’s not too late to sign up for the Nebraska Writers Guild Spring Conference taking place in Ashland this weekend. Hope to see some of you there!

Wrestling fans: What are some of the best written storylines you can remember? What are some of the worst? Let’s have a discussion in the comments section!

 

Posts similar to this one:

  • Are the stakes too high?Are the stakes too high?
  • 7 Essential Elements of a Story7 Essential Elements of a Story
  • The Right (and Wrong) Way to Kill a CharacterThe Right (and Wrong) Way to Kill a Character
  • Is Your Villain Stealing the Show?Is Your Villain Stealing the Show?
  • How to Turn a Good Guy Bad (a.k.a. the Heel Turn)How to Turn a Good Guy Bad (a.k.a. the Heel Turn)
  • How I Plot Fiction (or quasi-discovery write)How I Plot Fiction (or quasi-discovery write)
  • Podcast Episode 79 – Finding Meaning in Tragedy (And Tips on Writing Dark Fiction)Podcast Episode 79 – Finding Meaning in Tragedy (And Tips on Writing Dark Fiction)
  • A Cool Trick to Help Improve Your Revision SkillsA Cool Trick to Help Improve Your Revision Skills

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Never miss a post!

Subscribe to our mailing list and get updates sent to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

we respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

About Jason Bougger

Jason Bougger is a writer and blogger who lives in Omaha, Nebraska with his ever-growing family. His YA novel, Holy Fudgesicles, was published this year by Wings ePress and he has had over twenty short stories published in various print and online markets. In addition to his own writing, he is the owner and editor of Theme of Absence, an online magazine of fantasy, horror, and science fiction.

Hi There! I’m Jason.

Welcome to Write Good Books, a blog dedicated to helping new writers improve their craft and learn about the industry. Read More…

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

we respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

Top Posts & Pages

  • Who is Mary Sue and How Can You Kill Her?
    Who is Mary Sue and How Can You Kill Her?
  • Five Reasons to Start a New Paragraph
    Five Reasons to Start a New Paragraph
  • Thoughts from my first author fair
    Thoughts from my first author fair
  • Looking at Tolkien's 10 Tips for Writers
    Looking at Tolkien's 10 Tips for Writers

My Young Adult Novel

Tags

Agents Beginnings Blogging Characters cliches Conferences Critique Groups descriptions dialogue Doubt Editing endings fantasy Fear goals Holy Fudgesicles horror ideas Links marketing Motivation Nebraska Writers Guild Novels Pay Personal Plots podcast Point of View Queries Rejection Revisions science fiction Self-publishing setting Short Stories Social Media Stephen King success Theme of Absence Time Traditional Publishing worldbuilding Write Good Books Writer's Block Writing
Write Good Books - Blog Directory OnToplist.com

Write Good Books

  • About
  • Author Spotlight Submission Form
  • Contact
  • Podcast
  • Podcast Contact Form
  • Privacy Policy
  • Resources

Blog Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Write Good Books